Is it bad time when a wrestler is not given the choice of position after the two-point stalling penalty?

In wrestling, when a wrestler receives a two-point stalling penalty, the referee has the authority to determine the proper action associated with that penalty. A key aspect of the rules is that the penalized wrestler does not lose their choice of position; rather, the referee will usually restart the match from a neutral position regardless of any prior choice or position advantages.

Given this context, stating that it is "bad time" when a wrestler is not given the choice of position after a stalling penalty is inaccurate, as the rules dictate this process explicitly. The expectation is that the match resets to a neutral state to ensure fairness, particularly because stalling represents a violation of the spirit of active competition. Therefore, understanding how penalties are administered, including the protocol for starting positions after such an infraction, is crucial for wrestlers and coaches alike. The movement back to a neutral position allows both competitors to engage actively, supporting the integrity of the sport.